Benchmarks

Official Comparisons & Benchmarks

Benchmarks & Comparisons

Data is sourced from the comparison table and benchmark text on the official OpenFang website/README (noted as Feb 2026). It's recommended to view this as the "official public comparison" and verify independently for serious technical decisions.

Dimensional Comparison (Example)

FeatureOpenFangOpenClawZeroClawCrewAIAutoGenLangGraph
LanguageRustTypeScriptRustPythonPythonPython
Autonomous Hands7 built-inNoneNoneNoneNoneNone
Security Layers1636122
SandboxWASM dual-meteredNoneallowlistsNoneDockerNone
Channel adapters401315000
Tools53 + MCP + A2A (Official/README)50+12PluginsMCPLC tools
MemorySQLite + vectorfile-basedSQLite FTS54-layerexternalcheckpoints

Benchmark Data (Official Text Display)

  • Cold start time: OpenFang ~180ms (compared to OpenClaw ~5980ms)
  • Idle memory: OpenFang ~40MB
  • Install size: OpenFang ~32MB
  • Security systems: 16
  • Channel adapters: 40
  • LLM providers: 27

These metrics are prominently displayed on the homepage and the GitHub README.